United States v. Walling’s Empirical Analysis
982 F.2d 447 · 1992
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably United States v. Cook (1995), United States v. Allen (1994)
35 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Frady · Brewster v. Derwinski · Isaksen v. Vermont Castings, Inc. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fell below an objective standard of reasonableness,”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“The Strickland ineffectiveness test dovetails naturally with the cause and prejudice standard.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“in his direct appeal bars review unless he can show cause and resulting prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Novey v. Kilinger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.