Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

982 F.2d 525

Docket No. 92-2182EM.

Clay v. Armontrout

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: December 16, 1992. Filed: January 7, 1993.

This page is marked noindex.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-12-16

Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Gill v. Southwest Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation · Daniels v. Jones

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-12-16

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge, BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, and FAGG, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Kenneth Clay appeals the district court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's report holding that Clay's claims were procedurally barred and without merit. Clay's arguments that his claims are not procedurally barred are foreclosed by contrary holdings in Coleman v. Thompson, 111 S. Ct. 2546, 2566-67 (1991), and Daniels v. Jones, 944 F.2d 429, 430-31 (8th Cir. 1991). We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

/982/f2d/525 · .json · Public domain