United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
982 F.2d 757 · 1992
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2022
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 4083 · 18 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Chambers v. Maroney · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · United States v. Cronic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Sentencing Reform Act eliminated standard conditions, replacing them with mandatory and discretionary conditions. Regular meetings with a probation officer are not a mandatory condition of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (d). However, § 3583(d) indicates that the court may impose additional, discretionary conditions, including those listed in the probation statute at 18 U.S.C. § 3563 (b). 5 Smith, 982 F.2d at 764.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“how specific errors of counsel undermined the reliability of the finding of guilt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“While a court must conduct the analysis this section requires, it need not analyze the factors on the record for each condition. The challenged condition [visiting a probation officer], like most of the standard conditions imposed, is a basic administrative requirement essential to the functioning of the supervised release system. Id. (emphasis added) (citation omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.