Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 F.2d 798 - Claudio v. Scully

Claudio v. Scully’s Empirical Analysis

982 F.2d 798 · 1992

Citation profile

126
cited by 126 later decisions
5
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 126 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Mayo v. Henderson (1994), Billy-Eko v. United States (1993)

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 6 state decisions

7101992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Wade · Coleman v. Thompson · McMann v. Richardson · United States v. Cronic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 126 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although Strickland addressed the constitutional standard for ineffective assistance of counsel in the trial counsel context, our Circuit has also adopted the Strickland two-prong test in assessing the effectiveness of appellate counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “need not decide the content of appropriate standards for judging claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Cf. Strickland ... [citation omitted].” Evitts, 469 U.S. at 392 , 105 S.Ct. 830 . At least one judge has noted,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.