Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 FSUPP 409 - Woods v. Amtrak

Woods v. Amtrak’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood · Illinois Central Railroad v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “railroad companies may also be required to install additional warning devices at the direction of the Mississippi Department of Transportation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.