Cudd v. Aldrich’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Anderson v. Creighton · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Connick v. Myers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); Soderstrum , 925 F.2d at 141 (personal secretary to police chief found to be a confidential employee); Kinsey , 950 F.2d at 995 (school superintendent found to be within exception), cert. denied , 504 U.S. 941 , 112 S.Ct. 2275 , 119 L.Ed.2d 201 (1992). Cudd v. Aldrich , 982 F. Supp. 463 , 467 (S.D. Tex. 1997). See, e.g. , McBee , 703 F.2d at 842 (noting that as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garza v. Escobar“duties inherent in the position, rather than the actual duties performed by the employee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Garza v. Escobar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.