Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 FSUPP 515 - Hassell v. Chrysler Corp.

Hassell v. Chrysler Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 2009
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1051 (§ 1 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 271

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.