Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 P2D 250 - Williams v. Crawford

Williams v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on O'Link v. O'Link · Clauson v. Clauson · Hartland v. Hartland · Lowe v. Lowe · Zito v. Zito

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “from the language of the disputed provisions, other provisions, and relevant extrinsic evidence, with guidance from case law interpreting similar provisions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A contract is ambiguous only if, taken as a whole, it is reasonably subject to differing interpretations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[William] shall be granted all payments under his Civil Service pension during his lifetime. [Camille] shall be granted surviv-orship benefits upon [William]'s death equal to one-third the maximum survivor-ship benefits that may be elected, which means that [Camille] shall receive surviv-orship benefits at [William's] death of at least $6,912 per year, or $576 per month. [William] shall elect survivor benefits and shall be responsible for any required premiums or cost to insure [Camille]'s surviv-orship benefits. This Court shall retain jurisdiction as necessary to enforce these provisions.[ 4 ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.