Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2024
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Carnegie v. United States · Miller v. Fenton · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Scharffe v. Perkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“free and deliberate choice rather than intimidation, coercion, or deception.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gompf v. State · Siler v. State“[The atmosphere and events surrounding the elicitation of the statement, such as the use of violence, threats, promises, improper influence or official misconduct, the conduct of the defendant before and during the interrogation and the defendant's mental condition at the time the statement is made. ck, #k [A] confession offends due process if the suspect's will was overborne by the police and the suspect's capacity for self-determination was seriously impaired.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gunn v. State · Eckenrod v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.