Lukacs v. Luton’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 731 So. 2d 638 - Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA · 829 So. 2d 901 - Swett v. State · 604 So. 2d 452 - Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach Erosion · 714 So. 2d 440 - White v. State · 973 So. 2d 1107 - Polite v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To adopt the view of Appellant would lead to the absurd result of requiring stalking victims to show that they twice suffered from repeated harassment or following before obtaining a protective injunction. Were we to adopt such an interpretation, Appellant could have threatened or followed Appellee four times before the circuit court could issue a protective injunction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pickett v. Copeland“engag[ing] in a course of conduct directed at a specific person which causes substantial emotional distress to that person and serves no legitimate purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pickett v. Copeland“a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, which evidences a continuity of purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pickett v. Copeland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.