¶1Eddie Williams, Raiford, pro se.
¶2No appearance required for appellee.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4Affirmed. See Rangel v. State,937 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
¶5STONE, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
982 So. 2d 1234
Docket No. 4D08-1370.
Eddie WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 28, 2008.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-05-28
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2014
2 state decisions
Relies on Rangel v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2008-05-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Eddie Williams, Raiford, pro se.
¶2No appearance required for appellee.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4Affirmed. See Rangel v. State,937 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
¶5STONE, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.