Shavers v. Shavers’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Armstrong v. Armstrong · Rainey v. Rainey · 651 So. 2d 1068 - Ellis v. Ellis · 618 So. 2d 108 - Gardner v. Gardner · 759 So. 2d 1250 - Sanghi v. Sanghi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) endangers life, limb, or health, or creates a reasonable apprehension of such danger, rendering the relationship unsafe for the party seeking relief, or (2) is so unnatural and infamous as to make the marriage revolting to the non-offending spouse and render it impossible for that spouse to discharge the duties of marriage, thus destroying the basis for its continuance.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he party alleging cruel and inhuman treatment typically must corroborate the testimony.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“by a preponderance of the credible evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.