Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 SO2D 724 - Craig v. Craig

Craig v. Craig’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 651 So. 2d 1252 - Nelson v. Nelson · 680 So. 2d 538 - Maradie v. Maradie · 619 So. 2d 455 - Maturo v. City of Coral Gables · 708 So. 2d 329 - Crockett v. Crockett · Smith v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court may not, as was done here, simply adopt purported `facts' submitted to it in an argument in a legal memorandum or proposed judgment. See Smith v. Smith, 934 So.2d 636, 640-41 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (holding former husband's demonstrative aid and legal argument to be insufficient to support pension calculation).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.