Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

982 So. 2d 821

Docket No. 2008-B-0848.

In Re Liptak

In re Robert A. LIPTAK.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 30, 2008.

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2008-05-30

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 33 So. 3d 292 - State v. Tate (2010), 97 So. 3d 522 - State v. Taylor (2012)

26 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-05-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

¶2PER CURIAM.

¶3The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent entered a guilty plea to an offense involving possession of a controlled substance. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶4IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Robert A. Liptak, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17696, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day, to commence from the finality of judgment.

¶5IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

/982/so2d/821 · .json · Public domain