982 So. 2d 843 - State v. White’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 922 So. 2d 517 - State v. Pigford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court has recognized a mens rea requirement or criminal intent based on State v. Bias, 400 So.2d 650, 652 (La.1981), a case involving a virtually identical statute—unauthorized use of a movable, |nR.S. 14:68. State v. Joseph, 05-368 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/17/06) , 921 So.2d 1060, 1063 . “[T]he ‘evil’ state of mind of the actor normally distinguishes criminal acts (punishable by the state alone) from mere civil wrongs (actionable by private individuals against one another). C.Cr.P. art. 381.” State v. Bias, 400 So.2d at 652-53 . [footnote omitted]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.