Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 SW2D 156 - Robins v. Kroger Co.

Robins v. Kroger Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2010

7 state decisions

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 190th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co. · McConnell v. Southside Independent School District · American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. Grinnell · Centeq Realty, Inc. v. Siegler · Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. Cates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the utility of the product to the user and to the public as a whole weighed against the gravity and likelihood of injury from its use; (2) the availability of a substitute product which would meet the same need and not be unsafe or unreasonably expensive; (3) the manufacturer’s ability to eliminate the unsafe character of the product without seriously impairing its usefulness or significantly increasing its costs; (4) the user’s anticipated awareness of the dangers inherent in the product and their avoida-bility because of the general public knowledge of the obvious condition of the product, or of the existence of suitable warnings or instructions; and (5) the expectations of the ordinary consumer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.