Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 982 S.W.2d 933 - Gravis v. State

Gravis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 147th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Trident Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. · Jackson v. State · Reyes v. State · Cook v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While this section allows criminal responsibility for the conduct of another, thereby eliminating the necessity for proof of intent to commit the felony actually committed [capital murder], it does not excuse the state from proving a culpable mental state. In fact, the statute requires the state to show that the defendant had both the mens rea to engage in a conspiracy and the culpable mental state to commit the underlying, i.e., the intended felony. The mental state required for the underlying felony supplies the mens rea for the felony actually committed by the co-conspirator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.