Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 983 F.2d 1024 - Fortner v. Thomas

Fortner v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

983 F.2d 1024 · 1993

Citation profile

129
cited by 129 later decisions
5
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Baker v. Putnal (1996), Edwards v. Wallace Community College (1995)

43 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

5301993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Bell v. Wolfish · Bonner v. City of Prichard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[M]ost people have `a special sense of privacy in their genitals, and involuntary exposure of them in the presence of people of the other sex may be especially demeaning and humiliating.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'whether, under the most favorable version of the facts alleged, defendant's actions violate clearly established law.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) whether there is a valid, rational connection between the prison policy and the legitimate governmental interest asserted to justify it; (2) the existence of alternative means for inmates to exercise their constitutional rights; (3) the impact that accommodation of these constitutional rights may have on other guards and inmates, and on the allocation of prison resources; and (4) the absence of ready alternatives as evidence of the reasonableness of the regulation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.