Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

983 F.2d 1056

Docket No. 92-6740.

Howie v. Kurtz

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: September 30, 1992 Decided: January 8, 1993

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-01-08

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Asbury Leaphart, and Esther Leaphart v. Janet Hudson Sandy Laney Tim Taylor, Defendants

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-01-08

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.

Floyd Howie, Appellant Pro Se.

Ronna Dawn Gibbs, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, for Appellees.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Floyd Howie appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Howie v. Kurtz, No. CA91-165-C-C-P (W.D.N.C. June 18, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/983/f2d/1056 · .json · Public domain