Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

983 F.2d 1057

Docket No. 92-6596.

Richmond v. Waters

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: October 29, 1992 Decided: December 31, 1992

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1992-12-31

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Mohammed F. Azeem, United States of America v. Muhammed Z. Mannan

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1992-12-31

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-91-632-WN)

Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

Dismissed.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Guy Lancaster Richmond seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Richmond v. Waters, No. CA-91-632-WN (D. Md. June 5, 1992). We deny Richmond's motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/983/f2d/1057 · .json · Public domain