Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 983 F.2d 107 - Slone v. Herman

Slone v. Herman’s Empirical Analysis

983 F.2d 107 · 1993

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Davis v. Hall (2004), Hall v. Lombardi (1993)

15 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

1801993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Malley v. Briggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the state lost its lawful authority to hold Slone. Therefore, any continued detention unlawfully deprived Slone of his liberty, and a person's liberty is protected from unlawful state deprivation by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.