Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 983 F.2d 197 - The Cone Corporation v. Hillsborough County

The Cone Corporation v. Hillsborough County’s Empirical Analysis

983 F.2d 197 · 1993

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
September 1994
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ppellants have alleged no injury stemming from the operation of this provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.