United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
983 F.2d 216 · 1993
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Perry (2004), United States v. Monzel (2011)
36 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 495
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright · Flast v. Cohen · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as a collateral entity to the [criminal] proceedings, ha[d] not suffered a direct injury adequate to satisfy the Article III constitutional requirements”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he Supreme Court has stated that though restitution resembles a judgment “for the benefit of’ the victim, it is penal rather than compensatory.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The legislative history of the [Victim and Witness Protection] Act specifically states that § 3579(b)(5), recodified as § 3663(h)(2), greatly increases the victim’s chances of collecting restitution because either the victim or the United States can enforce the restitution order with the remedies contained in F.R.Civ.P. 64 to collect the restitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Auclair v. Sher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.