Associates Ltd v. Continental Insurance Company’s Empirical Analysis
983 F.2d 662 · 1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2014
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brewster v. Derwinski · Wilburn Boat Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company · Union Carbide Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Saskatchewan Government Insurance Office v. Spot Pack, Inc. · Albany Insurance Company v. Anh Thi Kieu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. whether the federal maritime rule constitutes “entrenched federal precedent,” which is consistently used to control the conduct of maritime actors; 2. whether the state has a substantial and legitimate interest in having its law applied; and 3. whether the state rule is materially different from the federal rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“entrenched federal precedent exists on the interpretation of the Inchmaree clause”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.