No 92-8068’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2018
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Republic National Bank of Miami v. United States · United States v. Three Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Dollars ($364,960.00) in United States Currency · United States v. One Chevrolet Impala Vin 1l69u8s156817 · Hanks v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. · United States v. Little Al
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]lthough we review the district court's finding of facts for clear error, the question of whether the facts are sufficient to constitute probable cause is a question of law, which we review de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a reasonable ground for belief ... supported by less than prima facie proof but more than mere suspicion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[T]he burden of proof in a criminal trial differs from that involved in a forfeiture action. The government need not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a substantial connection exists between the forfeited property and the illegal activity;” rather, probable cause is sufficient. Thus, the subsequent acquittal of the claimant on the underlying criminal charges does not mean that the government failed, ipso facto, to meet the more lenient probable cause requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bergstrom
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.