Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 983 F.2d 968 - United States v. Martinez

United States v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

983 F.2d 968 · 1992

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably United States v. Wood (1997), United States v. Eylicio-Montoya (1995)

34 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

4001992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Rakas v. Illinois · Florida v. Royer · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[G]iven the uncertainty over the ownership of the vehicle, she may have possessed a reasonable expectation of privacy over the contents of the luggage, [but] not over the trunk where the luggage was located.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Absent standing, we need not consider either [defendant's] challenge to the initial search of the trunk or the related issues of consent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether under the same circumstances a reasonable officer would have made the stop in the absence of the invalid purpose.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.