Gicharu v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1362 (§ 292 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · LOZADA · Kucana v. Holder · Jennings v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he BIA . . . entertains claims for equitable tolling of the filing deadline for motions to reopen where it is alleged that ineffective assistance of counsel caused the motion to be untimely.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the standard for establishing equitable tolling is daunting, it does not render review by the BIA . . . unavailable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“provides a process for adjudicating ineffective assistance of counsel claims through a motion to reopen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.