983 So. 2d 562 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
112
cited by 112 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 110 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · Neder v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“errors in orders entered as a result of the sentencing process,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. EDP v. State · S.S. v. State“not [just] any error in the sentencing process.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The rule was never intended to allow a defendant (or defense counsel) to sit silent in the face of a procedural error in the sentencing process and then, if unhappy with the result, file a motion under rule 3.800(b).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.