Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

983 So. 2d 760

Docket No. 5D07-2762.

Carpenter v. State

Shawn Carlos CARPENTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-06-13

Relies on 710 So. 2d 182 - Shaw v. State

Decided 2008-06-13

¶1James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Shawn Carpenter appeals a judgment and sentence following a revocation of probation. The probation violation concerned a skirmish that occurred at the alleged victim's home. At the violation *761 hearing, the victim was asked, "And during that altercation, you ended up being pushed by Mr. Carpenter; isn't that correct?" The victim responded, "No. Actually what happened was, I was calling 911, they were fighting, I got in be — tried to get in between them, and got pushed. And then the other guy fell on me." On cross-examination, the victim stated that Mr. Carpenter did not intentionally touch or strike her and any contact was accidental. Apparently, the victim's original statement to the police reflected that she called 911 when her former boyfriend and Mr. Carpenter began fighting and Mr. Carpenter subsequently pushed her and tried to push the phone out of her hand. Although the prosecutor showed the victim her original statement and questioned her in an attempt to impeach her testimony, no direct response was ever obtained.

¶5The victim's purported prior inconsistent statement was not established and even had it been, a prior inconsistent statement is insufficient to sustain a violation of probation. Shaw v. State, 710 So.2d 182, 184 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

¶6REVERSED.

¶7ORFINGER, TORPY, and COHEN, JJ., concur.

/983/so2d/760 · .json · Public domain