Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

983 So. 2d 772

Docket No. 5D07-3506.

LLORENS v. State

Sarah Lourdes LLORENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-06-13

Relies on 573 So. 2d 330 - State v. Hawthorne · Glaubius v. State · Lamb v. State

Decided 2008-06-13

¶1James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We find the court did not abuse its authority in ordering restitution. See Glaubius v. State,688 So.2d 913 (Fla. 1997); State v. Hawthorne,573 So.2d 330 (Fla.1991). The State concedes that a mathematical error was made in the amount ordered and that the proper amounts should have been $1168.72 for the necklace and $443.04 for the stereo. We herewith amend the judgment accordingly. *773See Lamb v. State,732 So.2d 350 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

¶5AFFIRMED; Judgment AMENDED.

¶6ORFINGER, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.

/983/so2d/772 · .json · Public domain