Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 983 So. 2d 954 - State v. Forbs

983 So. 2d 954 - State v. Forbs’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · State v. Jacobs · 445 So. 2d 1198 - State v. Wright · State v. Shapiro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice to do any of the following shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than ten years, or may be fined not more than one hundred thousand dollars, or both: (1) To defraud a financial institution. (2) To obtain any of the monies, funds, credits, assets, | ^securities, or other property owned by or under the custody or control of a financial institution by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, practices, transactions, representations, or promises.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “by the existence of a scheme which was 'reasonably calculated to deceive persons of ordinary prudence and comprehension,' and this intention is shown by examining the scheme itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.