Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 983 SW2D 249 - Mosley v. State

Mosley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

383
cited by 383 later decisions
5
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 374 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 383 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Ladd v. State (1999), State v. Allen (1999)

3 federal appellate · 374 state decisions

25001998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Penry v. Lynaugh · Payne v. Tennessee · New Jersey v. New York · Guzman v. State · Spring Meadows Apartment Complex Ltd. Partnership v. Stallings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 383 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether, taking into consideration all of the evidence, including the circumstances of the offense, the defendant’s character and background, and the personal moral culpability of the defendant, there is a sufficient mitigating circumstance or circumstances to warrant that a sentence of life imprisonment rather than a death sentence be imposed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. ““Both victim impact and victim character evidence are admissible, in the context of the mitigation special issue, to show the uniqueness of the victim, the harm caused by the defendant, and as rebuttal to the defendant’s mitigating evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.