Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

983 S.W.2d 565

Bicknese v. Sagehorn

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1998

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1998-10-27

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2014

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-10-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Lessee appeals from a judgment entered against him in an action on account. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

¶3We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/983/sw2d/565 · .json · Public domain