Hidalgo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Moon, Cameron (2014), State v. Andrews (2011)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · United States v. Wade · Gault · Kirby v. Illinois · New Jersey v. T. L. O.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“protected and rehabilitated rather than subjected to the harshness of the criminal system[.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the child is alleged to have committed a felony; (2) the child was fourteen years or older if the alleged offense is a first degree felony or fifteen years or older if the alleged offense is a second degree felony; 7 and (3) after a full investigation and hearing, the juvenile court determines that there is probable cause to believe that the juvenile committed the offense alleged and that because of the seriousness of the offense alleged or the background of the juvenile, the welfare of the community requires criminal proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re T. S. · Cameron Moon v. State“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re M.P. · In Re MP
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.