Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 984 F.2d 163 - White v. Smith

White v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

984 F.2d 163 · 1993

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably United States v. Frost (1997), Gall v. United States (1994)

16 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Estelle v. McGuire · Remmer v. United States · Rushen v. Spain · Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Carver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not all communications with jurors warrant a hearing for a determination of potential bias.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the extremely limited nature of the contact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.