Bh Ch Je Cz Eg Og Sg Cg Pg Ag Pierce v. T Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2019
8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp. · Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in Action · In re Disbarment of Sabiston · Marino v. Ortiz · Karcher v. May
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An order denying intervention is final and appealable.... By necessity such an order is subject to immediate review, because denial of intervention precludes the proposed intervenor's ability to appeal the later judgment (and at that time to challenge the earlier denial of intervention).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must be filed within thirty days after the date of entry of the judgment or order appealed from.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“improper attempt, by filing a virtually identical intervention motion, to circumvent his failure to appeal the first motion's denial within the required time”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.