Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 984 F.2d 597 - United States v. Bennett

United States v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

984 F.2d 597 · 1993

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
August 2022
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably United States v. DePriest (1993), United States v. Green (2010)

24 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2301993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1510 · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 844

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · United States v. Harriss · Chapman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'(1) the degree to which the prosecutor's remarks have a tendency to mislead the jury and to prejudice the accused; (2) whether the remarks were isolated or extensive; (3) absent the remarks, the strength of competent proof introduced to establish the guilt of the accused; and (4) whether the comments were deliberately placed before the jury to divert attention to extraneous matters.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “(1) the remarks or conduct were improper, and (2) the remarks prejudicially affected his rights so as to deprive him of a fair trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “defendant's membership in the conspiracy is presumed to continue until he withdraws from the conspiracy by affirmative action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.