Chappell Homebanc Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably Hawxhurst v. Pettibone Corp. (1994), In the Matter of Midway Airlines Incorporated Appeal of Jensen Cabinet Incorporated (1995)
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Simmons v. Savell · In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-Appellant · In re Szostek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The provisions of a confirmed plan bind the debtor and each creditor, whether or not the claim of such creditor is provided for by the plan, and whether or not such creditor has objected to, has accepted, or has rejected the plan.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(b) Subject to subsections (a) and (c) of this section, the plan may— (5) notwithstanding paragraph (2) of this subsection, provide for the curing of any default within a reasonable time and maintenance of payments while the case is pending on any unsecured claim or secured claim on which the last payment is due after the date on which the final payment under the plan is due....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Failure to object to the confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan is deemed acceptance .... A confirmed Chapter 13 plan is binding on all creditors provided for within the plan.... Creditors must object to confirmation, appear at hearings or otherwise put disputes before the bankruptcy court in order to raise objections. If the creditor fails to do so, the creditor is bound by the Chapter 13 plan.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Adams · In Re Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.