Pojoy-Deleon v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Gailius v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Nikijuluw v. Gonzales · Lopez de Hincapie v. Gonzales · Jianli Chen v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“membership in a particular social group.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“group. That conclusion is supported by the record: Olimpio testified that the first time her ex-partner hit her was when she left him and went to stay with her father, and that he threatened her when she refused to return. In short, the evidence in the record does not compel a finding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.