Pyrenee, Ltd. v. Wocom Commodities, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1782 · 7 U.S.C. § 6B
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Pain v. United Technologies Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“relies exclusively on Rule 4(k)(2) to establish personal jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.