← 984 FSUPP 443 - Freeman v. Witco, Corp.

Freeman v. Witco, Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

cited by 4 later decisions

December 2011

most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2011

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1447

Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · Chapman v. Burton Berger & Associates · Inc v. Miller Brewing Company · Sws Erectors Inc v. Infax Inc · De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“Admit that you will not seek damages nor will you execute on any judgment or judgments rendered in your favor against any of the defendants in excess of $75,000, exclusive of interests and costs.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 360 F. Supp. 2d 825 - Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · 1 F. Supp. 2d 628 - McLain v. American International Recovery, Inc.
““The notice of removal of a civil action or proceeding shall be filed within thirty days after receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which such action or proceeding is based, or within thirty days after service of summons upon the defendant of such initial pleading has been filed in court and is not required to be served on the defendant, whichever period is shorter. If the case stated by the initial pleading is not removable, a notice of .removal may be filed within thirty days after receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of an amended pleading, motion order or other paper from which it may first be ascertained that the case is one which is of has became removable, except that a case may not be removed on the basis of jurisdiction conferred by § 1332 of this title more that one year after commencement "of the action.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 9 F. Supp. 2d 661 - Leboeuf v. Texaco
“Denied. This request is premature. Mr. Clayton Freeman is continuing to work light duty. We cannot within a reasonable legal and/or medical probability stipulate to this request at this time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 1 F. Supp. 2d 628 - McLain v. American International Recovery, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.