Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

984 N.E.2d 220

In re Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2013

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 2013-03-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2014

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-03-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1PUBLISHED ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND CONCLUDING PROCEEDING

¶2A “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action” against Respondent was filed on March 15, 2011. Respondent has now tendered to this Court an affidavit of resignation from the bar of this State, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 28(17).

¶3IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the resignation from the bar of this State tendered by Respondent is accepted effective immediately. The Clerk of this Court is directed to record Respondent’s resignation on the Roll of Attorneys. Respondent shall fulfill all the applicable duties under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26)(d).

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any attorney disciplinary proceedings pending against Respondent are hereby dismissed as moot because of Respondent’s resignation.

¶5Respondent shall be ineligible to petition for reinstatement to the practice of law for five years from the date of this order. See Admis. Disc. R. 23(4)(a). If Respondent seeks reinstatement, the misconduct admitted in Respondent’s affidavit of resignation, as well as any other allegations of misconduct, may be addressed in the reinstatement process. Approval of a petition for reinstatement is discretionary and requires clear and convincing evidence of the petitioner’s remorse, rehabilitation, and fitness to practice law. See Admis. Disc. R. 23(4)(b).

¶6The costs of this proceeding are assessed against Respondent. With the acceptance of this resignation, the hearing officer appointed in this case is discharged.

¶7The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the hearing officer, to the parties or their respective attorneys, and to all other entities entitled to notice under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(3)(d). The Clerk is further directed to post this order to the Court’s website, and Thomson Reuters is directed to publish a copy of this order in the bound volumes of this Court’s decisions.

All Justices concur.
/984/ne2d/220 · .json · Public domain