Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 984 SO2D 395 - State v. Lupo

State v. Lupo’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Nebbia v. People of State of New York · Munn v. Illinois · Joseph Lochner v. People of the State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Similarly, in Summers v. Adams Motor Co., 34 Ala.App. 319 , 39 So.2d 300 (1949), the Court of Appeals upheld a liquidated-damages provision of a contract for the sale of an automobile. Summers, the purchaser, had agreed not to resell the car within six months without first offering to resell it to Adams Motor Company for its reasonable market value. The court stated: “ ‘Before the contract was executed the Motor Company was not obligated to sell or deliver the automobile that was sold to Mrs. Summers except on terms agreeable to the dealer. Neither was Mrs. Summers obligated to purchase that automobile from the Motor Company except on terms agreeable to her. It would be an unwarranted interference with their liberty of contract for this court to say that they could not enter into the agreement that was entered into .... ’ “34 Ala.App. at 323, 39 So.2d at 303 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.