Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

984 S.W.2d 500

State ex rel. Sharp v. Romines

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 9, 1999

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1999-02-09

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2016

3 state decisions

Relies on Anglim v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Willman v. McMillen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-02-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Relators filed a class action in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. The petition asserts that the University of Missouri has charged tuition in violation of section 172.360, RSMo. A declaratory judgment, injunctive relief and refunds are the relief sought. The University of Missouri filed a motion asserting venue was improper in the city of St. Louis. The respondent judge found that venue was proper in St. Louis County but that St. Louis County was not a convenient forum for the suit. He, therefore, ordered the case transferred to Boone County. Rela-tors seek a writ from this Court prohibiting the transfer of this case to Boone County.

¶2Missouri’s venue statutes do not permit an intrastate application of the doctrine of inconvenient forum. Anglim v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 832 S.W.2d 298, 302 (Mo. banc 1992). “The statutory designation of proper venue as the site where the cause of action accrued presupposes legislative determination that it cannot be overly inconvenient for a defendant to appear in that location.” Willman v. McMillen, 779 S.W.2d 583, 586 (Mo. banc 1989). Having found that the defendant in the underlying cause is subject to venue in St. Louis County, the respondent was not permitted to order the case transferred to another county on the basis of forum non conveniens.

¶3*501The preliminary order in prohibition is made permanent.

BENTON, C.J., and LIMBAUGH, COVINGTON, WHITE and WOLFF, JJ., and BARNEY and KAROHL, Special Judges, concur.PRICE and HOLSTEIN, JJ., not participating.
/984/sw2d/500 · .json · Public domain