Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 984 SW2D 736 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sullivan v. Louisiana · Cain v. State · Breazeale v. State · Whitten v. State · Carranza v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant may not effectively waive his right to jury trial without meeting [the requirement of Article 1.13, unless] the record clearly reflects that the defendant “personally gave express consent in open court, intelligently and knowingly.” (Citations omitted; Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Thus, if the record contains no written jury waiver, we will find that the defendant’s 'substantial rights’ have been affected unless ‘the record clearly reflects that the defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.