Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

985 A.2d 390

DREDDEN v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 14, 2009

Supreme Court of Delaware · decided 2009-12-14

Decided 2009-12-14

TONIO DREDDEN, Defendant Below, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

No. 677, 2009.

¶1Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: December 8, 2009.
Decided: December 14, 2009.

¶2

ORDER

¶3HENRY DuPONT RIDGELY, Justice.

¶4This 14th day of December 2009, the Court has considered the Clerk's notice to show cause that was sent to the appellant by certified mail on November 20, 2009. The Clerk's notice directed that the appellant show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. The appellant has not responded to the notice to show cause. The appellant's failure to respond to the notice to show cause is deemed to be his consent to the dismissal of this appeal.

¶5NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

/985/a2d/390 · .json · Public domain