Yniques’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Casas Office Machines, Inc. v. Mita Copystar America, Inc. (1994), Charles McDowell Jr v. Arthur Calderon (1999)
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Brewster v. Derwinski · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Strawbridge v. Curtiss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“departure” from the analysis required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 in that it allows the joinder of a necessary non-diverse party and a subsequent remand to state court. Under the Rule 19 alone, a necessary party who, if joined, would destroy complete diversity could be considered”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f after removal the plaintiff seeks to join additional defendants whose joinder would destroy subject matter jurisdiction, the court may deny joinder, or permit joinder and remand the action to the State court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Section 1447(e)] takes advantage of the opportunity opened by removal from a state court to permit remand if a plaintiff seeks to join a diversity-destroying defendant after removal.... Joinder coupled with remand may be more attractive than either dismissal under 19(b) or denial of joinder____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.