Martin v. Deiriggi’s Empirical Analysis
985 F.2d 129 · 1992
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Carter v. Ball (1994), Chaudhry v. Gallerizzo (1999)
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 217 · 29 U.S.C. § 255
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. · McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co. · Brock v. Superior Care, Inc. · Mullen v. Princess Anne Volunteer Fire Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well-settled that decisions regarding the admission and exclusion of evidence are peculiarly within the province of the district court, not to be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he six page complaint at issue here discussed liquidated damages in two different paragraphs”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Frank's v. Ross · Franks v. Ross“the statutory scheme gives the Secretary a choice: if she wants to recover liquidated damages, the price she pays is a jury trial' for the defendant on the back pay issue; if she would rather forgo the jury trial, she can opt for injunc-tive relief under § 217 and obtain a, back pay award as an equitable remedy incidental to an injunction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.