Morris v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis
985 F.2d 143 · 1993
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
August 2007
most recently cited
14 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Chandler v. Roudebush · Carnegie v. United States · Moore v. Devine · Pecker v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[federal-employee] plaintiff [who files a civil action] may limit and tailor his request for de novo review, raising questions about the remedy without exposing himself to de novo review of a finding of discrimination.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“erred in considering de novo a question of fact relevant to remedy which had also been considered and determined by the agency in the context of discrimination.” Id at 146. 9 . The Court notes that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a federal employee may seek enforcement of an EEOC decision without risking a de novo review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Timmons v. White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.