White’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 15 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Sweeton v. Brown (1994), Blakely v. United States (2002)
7 federal appellate · 15 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · New York v. Shore Realty Corp. · McCall v. Batson · Dedham Water Company v. Cumberland Farms Dairy Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The claims need only revolve around a central fact pattern.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Peter Bay Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Andrew R. Stillman Joy H. Stillman John G. Catts Sheila J. Roebuck Antonio Godinez Bonnie Godinez Michael Burgamy Ethlyn Hall, Intervening in District Court v. James Henry Carol Henry L.D. Kirk Scott F. Meese Donna G. Meese Arie Liebeskind Doreen Liebeskind Jim R. Hayes Zaquin S. Hayes Jeffrey Price Steven Paul Jann Paul St. John Land Investment L.P. Andrews St. John Trust, Intervening in District Court Peter Bay Owners Association, Inc., in 01-3726 James Henry, Carol Henry and Robert D. Blakeney Ii, in 01-3727 (Pursuant to Rule 12(a), f.r.a.p.) Andrews St. John Trust, in 01-3728 · Peter Bay Homeowners Ass'n v. Stillman“(i) that the site is a “facility” as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (9); (ii) that a release or threatened release of a hazardous substance has occurred on the site; (iii) that the release or threatened release has caused plaintiff to incur response costs; and (iv) that each defendant falls within one of the categories of “hable parties” set forth in § 9607(a).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.